<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>notmuch/bindings/python-cffi/tests/test_thread.py, branch 0.38.1</title>
<subtitle>thread-based email index, search, and tagging</subtitle>
<id>https://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch/atom?h=0.38.1</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch/atom?h=0.38.1'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch/'/>
<updated>2022-01-09T23:34:58Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>Merge tag '0.34.3'</title>
<updated>2022-01-09T23:34:58Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Bremner</name>
<email>david@tethera.net</email>
</author>
<published>2022-01-09T23:34:58Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch/commit/?id=63d3b2b5cf8702b5fecea77392ce46f8a8249175'/>
<id>urn:sha1:63d3b2b5cf8702b5fecea77392ce46f8a8249175</id>
<content type='text'>
notmuch 0.34.3 release
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bindings/python-cffi: search for config by default</title>
<updated>2022-01-09T19:16:51Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Bremner</name>
<email>david@tethera.net</email>
</author>
<published>2022-01-08T21:21:43Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch/commit/?id=8b737af28bc377db3e661a5744f3b7479b7ce485'/>
<id>urn:sha1:8b737af28bc377db3e661a5744f3b7479b7ce485</id>
<content type='text'>
The previous (pre-0.34.2) constructor searched for a config file but
only if the database path was not specified, and only to retrieve
database.path. Neither of the available options (CONFIG.SEARCH or
CONFIG.NONE) matches this semantics exactly, but CONFIG.SEARCH causes
less breakage for people who relied on the old behaviour to set their
database.path [1]. Since it also seems like the friendlier option in
the long run, this commit switches to CONFIG.SEARCH as default.

This requires a certain amount of updating the pytest tests, but most
users will actually have a config file, unlike the test environment.

[1]: id:87fsqijx7u.fsf@metapensiero.it
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>bindings/python-cffi: add matched property to message objects</title>
<updated>2022-01-01T15:48:40Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Bremner</name>
<email>david@tethera.net</email>
</author>
<published>2022-01-01T14:36:43Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch/commit/?id=9cc026f3daaa7731527787f8c7e729c0a08c456c'/>
<id>urn:sha1:9cc026f3daaa7731527787f8c7e729c0a08c456c</id>
<content type='text'>
Existing users of the legacy python bindings use
message.get_flags(Message.FLAG.MATCH) to determine which messages in a
thread matched. Since the bindings don't provide get_flags anymore,
they should provide a property analogous to the existing "excluded"
property.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Rename package to notmuch2</title>
<updated>2019-12-03T12:12:30Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Floris Bruynooghe</name>
<email>flub@devork.be</email>
</author>
<published>2019-11-17T16:41:35Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch/commit/?id=e2df30f7a98f91543d0b3561dbb366eb4b3d812c'/>
<id>urn:sha1:e2df30f7a98f91543d0b3561dbb366eb4b3d812c</id>
<content type='text'>
This is based on a previous discussion on the list where this was more
or less seen as the least-bad option.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Introduce CFFI-based python bindings</title>
<updated>2019-12-03T12:12:30Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Floris Bruynooghe</name>
<email>flub@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-10-08T21:03:12Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch/commit/?id=83c2d158983875bf77a9b7662894df585b61741c'/>
<id>urn:sha1:83c2d158983875bf77a9b7662894df585b61741c</id>
<content type='text'>
This introduces CFFI-based Python3-only bindings.
The bindings aim at:
- Better performance on pypy
- Easier to use Python-C interface
- More "pythonic"
  - The API should not allow invalid operations
  - Use native object protocol where possible
- Memory safety; whatever you do from python, it should not coredump.
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
