X-Git-Url: https://git.notmuchmail.org/git?a=blobdiff_plain;f=emacs%2Fnotmuch-lib.el;h=d315f7656e9bc4a004575faa14be386a858cdb83;hb=61fa5c0bb88fd3cd4a52d5a5b93a12bed58c063e;hp=924253733a8de115ef7b0d263ba9ce7cb9ed4b5a;hpb=643ce61c1babf6e73ca7e03fb907282e7ee3b176;p=notmuch diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-lib.el b/emacs/notmuch-lib.el index 92425373..d315f765 100644 --- a/emacs/notmuch-lib.el +++ b/emacs/notmuch-lib.el @@ -42,8 +42,9 @@ (defgroup notmuch-send nil "Sending messages from Notmuch." - :group 'notmuch - :group 'message) + :group 'notmuch) + +(custom-add-to-group 'notmuch-send 'message 'custom-group) (defgroup notmuch-crypto nil "Processing and display of cryptographic MIME parts." @@ -68,6 +69,9 @@ ;; +(defvar notmuch-search-history nil + "Variable to store notmuch searches history.") + (defcustom notmuch-saved-searches nil "A list of saved searches to display." :type '(alist :key-type string :value-type string) @@ -129,6 +133,15 @@ the user hasn't set this variable with the old or new value." (interactive) (kill-buffer (current-buffer))) +(defun notmuch-prettify-subject (subject) + ;; This function is used by `notmuch-search-process-filter' which + ;; requires that we not disrupt its' matching state. + (save-match-data + (if (and subject + (string-match "^[ \t]*$" subject)) + "[No Subject]" + subject))) + ;; (defun notmuch-common-do-stash (text) @@ -147,14 +160,14 @@ the user hasn't set this variable with the old or new value." (setq list (cdr list))) (nreverse out))) -; This lets us avoid compiling these replacement functions when emacs -; is sufficiently new enough to supply them alone. We do the macro -; treatment rather than just wrapping our defun calls in a when form -; specifically so that the compiler never sees the code on new emacs, -; (since the code is triggering warnings that we don't know how to get -; rid of. -; -; A more clever macro here would accept a condition and a list of forms. +;; This lets us avoid compiling these replacement functions when emacs +;; is sufficiently new enough to supply them alone. We do the macro +;; treatment rather than just wrapping our defun calls in a when form +;; specifically so that the compiler never sees the code on new emacs, +;; (since the code is triggering warnings that we don't know how to get +;; rid of. +;; +;; A more clever macro here would accept a condition and a list of forms. (defmacro compile-on-emacs-prior-to-23 (form) "Conditionally evaluate form only on emacs < emacs-23." (list 'when (< emacs-major-version 23)