If we're building against a version of Xapian that doesn't offer
retrying the lock, we should be honest and describe the tests as
broken, rather than marking them as missing a test prerequisite.
missing test prerequisites should be for specific components of the
test harness that are missing, not for the backend library notmuch
uses.
test_description="locking"
. $(dirname "$0")/test-lib.sh || exit 1
test_description="locking"
. $(dirname "$0")/test-lib.sh || exit 1
-if [ "${NOTMUCH_HAVE_XAPIAN_DB_RETRY_LOCK}" = "0" ]; then
- test_subtest_missing_external_prereq_["lock retry support"]=t
-fi
-
add_email_corpus
test_begin_subtest "blocking open"
add_email_corpus
test_begin_subtest "blocking open"
+if [ $NOTMUCH_HAVE_XAPIAN_DB_RETRY_LOCK -ne 1 ]; then
+ test_subtest_known_broken
+fi
test_C ${MAIL_DIR} <<'EOF'
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
test_C ${MAIL_DIR} <<'EOF'
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
+if [ $NOTMUCH_HAVE_XAPIAN_DB_RETRY_LOCK -ne 1 ]; then
+ test_subtest_known_broken
+fi
test_expect_equal_file EXPECTED OUTPUT
test_done
test_expect_equal_file EXPECTED OUTPUT
test_done