-Write a "notmuch tag" command to add/remove tags from messages
-matching a search query.
+Fix the things that are causing the most pain to new users
+----------------------------------------------------------
+1. A new import is tagging all messages as "inbox" -- total pain
-Write a "notmuch show" that displays a single thread.
+2. Allow an easy way to get tags from directory names (if the user has them)
+
+3. Fix Xapian defect #250 so tagging is fast.
+
+Emacs interface (notmuch.el)
+----------------------------
+Make the keybindings help ('?') display the summary of each command's
+documentation, not the function name.
+
+Add a global keybinding table for notmuch, and then view-specific
+tables that add to it.
+
+Add a command to archive all threads in a search view.
+
+Add a '|' binding from the search view.
+
+Add a binding to run a search from notmuch-show-mode.
+
+When a thread has been entirely read, start out by closing all
+messages except those that matched the search terms.
+
+Add support for choosing from one of the user's configured email
+addresses for the From line.
+
+Make 'notmuch-show-pipe-message have a private history.
+
+Add support for a delete keybinding that adds a "deleted" tag to the
+current message/thread and make searches not return deleted messages
+by default, (unless the user asks explicitly for deleted messags in
+the search query).
+
+Add support to "mute" a thread (add a "muted" tag and then don't
+display threads in searches by default where any message of the thread
+has the "muted" tag).
+
+Portability
+-----------
+Fix configure script to test each compiler warning we want to use.
+
+Completion
+----------
+Fix bash completion to complete multiple search options (both --first
+and *then* --max-threads), and also complete value for --sort=
+(oldest-first or newest-first).
+
+notmuch command-line tool
+-------------------------
+Teach "notmuch search" to return many different kinds of results. Some
+ideas:
+
+ notmuch search --for threads # Default if no --for is given
+ notmuch search --for messages
+ notmuch search --for tags
+ notmuch search --for addresses
+ notmuch search --for terms
+
+Add a "--format" option to "notmuch search", (something printf-like
+for selecting what gets printed).
+
+Add a "--count-only" (or so?) option to "notmuch search" for returning
+the count of search results.
+
+Give "notmuch restore" some progress indicator. Until we get the
+Xapian bugs fixed that are making this operation slow, we really need
+to let the user know that things are still moving.
+
+Add a "-f <filename>" option to select an alternate configuration
+file.
+
+Fix notmuch.c to call add_timestamp/get_timestamp with path names
+relative to the database path. (Otherwise, moving the database to a
+new directory will result in notmuch creating new timestamp documents
+and leaving stale ones behind.)
+
+Ensure that "notmuch new" is sane if its first, giant indexing session
+gets interrupted, (that is, ensure that any results indexed so far are
+flushed).
+
+Fix notmuch.c to use a DIR prefix for directory timestamps, (the idea
+being that it can then add other non-directory timestamps such as for
+noting how far back in the past mail has been indexed, and whether it
+needs to re-tag messages based on a theoretical "auto-tags"
+configuration file).
+
+Make "notmuch new" notice when a mail directory has gone more than a
+month without receiving new mail and use that to trigger the printing
+of the note that the user might want to mark the directory read-only.
+
+Also make "notmuch new" optionally able to just mark those month-old
+directories read-only on its own. (Could conflict with low-volume
+lists such as announce lists if they are setup to deliver to their own
+maildirs.)
+
+Allow configuration for filename patterns that should be ignored when
+indexing.
+
+notmuch library
+---------------
+Provide a sane syntax for date ranges. First, we don't want to require
+both endpoints to be specified. For example it would be nice to be
+able to say things like "since:2009-01-1" or "until:2009-01-1" and
+have the other enpoint be implicit. Second we'de like to support
+relative specifications of time such as "since:'2 months ago'". To do
+any of this we're probably going to need to break down an write our
+own parser for the query string rather than using Xapian's QueryParser
+class.
+
+Make failure to read a file (such as a permissions problem) a warning
+rather than an error (should be similar to the existing warning for a
+non-mail file).
+
+Add support for files that are moved or deleted (which obviously need
+to be handled differently).
+
+Actually compile and install a libnotmuch shared library.
Fix to use the *last* Message-ID header if multiple such headers are
encountered, (I noticed this is one thing that kept me from seeing the
same message-ID values as sup).
-Think about this race condition:
-
- A client executes "notmuch search"
- Then executes "notmuch show" on a thread
- While user is reading, new mail is added to database for the thread
- Client asks for the thread to be archived.
-
- The bug here is that email that was never read will be
- archived. That's bad. With the command set above, the user can
- avoid the problem by just not running "notmuch new" while reading
- mail, but the same problems exists with the API. One possible
- solution would be to store an additional timestamp with each mail
- document for the time it was added to the database. Then searches
- could return a timestamp, and the client could pass that same
- timestamp back to the archive command to not modify any messages
- with a timestamp newer than what's passed.
+Add support for the user to specify custom headers to be indexed.
+
+Add support for configuring "virtual tags" which are a tuple of
+(tag-name, search-specification). The database is responsible for
+ensuring that the virtual tag is always consistent.
+
+Think about optimizing chunked searches (max-threads > 0) to avoid
+repeating work. That would be saving state from the previous chunk and
+reusing it if the next search is the next chunk with the same search
+string.
+
+General
+-------
+Audit everything for dealing with out-of-memory (and drop xutil.c).
+
+Write a test suite.
+
+Achieve 100% test coverage with the test suite.
+
+Investigate why the notmuch database is slightly larger than the sup
+database for the same corpus of email.
+
+Xapian
+------
+Fix defect #250
+
+ replace_document should make minimal changes to database file
+ http://trac.xapian.org/ticket/250
+
+ It looks like it's going to be easy to fix. Here's the file to
+ change:
+
+ xapian-core/backends/flint/flint_database.cc
+
+ And look for:
+
+ // FIXME - in the case where there is overlap between the new
+ // termlist and the old termlist, it would be better to compare the
+ // two lists, and make the minimum set of modifications required.
+ // This would lead to smaller changesets for replication, and
+ // probably be faster overall
+
+ So I think this might be as easy as just walking over two
+ sorted lists looking for differences.
+
+ Note that this is in the currently default "flint" backend,
+ but the Xapian folks are probably more interested in fixing
+ the in-development "chert" backend. So the patch to get
+ upstreamed there will probably also fix:
+
+ xapian-core/backends/chert/chert_database.cc
+
+ (I'm hoping the fix will be the same---an identical comment
+ exists there.)
+
+ Also, if you want to experiment with the chert backend,
+ compile current Xapian source and run notmuch with
+ XAPIAN_PREFER_CHERT=1. I haven't tried that yet, but there are
+ claims that a chert database can be 40% smaller than an
+ equivalent flint database.
+
+Report this bug:
+
+ "tag:foo and tag:bar and -tag:deleted" goes insane
+
+ This seems to be triggered by a Boolean operator next to a
+ token starting with a non-word character---suddenly all the
+ Boolean operators get treated as literal tokens)
projects / notmuch / blobdiff