X-Git-Url: https://git.notmuchmail.org/git?p=notmuch;a=blobdiff_plain;f=lib%2Fthread.cc;h=b599a97d445ec1cd5a5efbe647f85ae2f95efb8a;hp=3561b27f743976d2c2d1918d33fc2a8d33469c74;hb=9b568e73e1afc211306d18dac3d27df4a07a0fdd;hpb=7cfa1c69610bcf15fb47868131d3d9102f899225 diff --git a/lib/thread.cc b/lib/thread.cc index 3561b27f..b599a97d 100644 --- a/lib/thread.cc +++ b/lib/thread.cc @@ -390,11 +390,15 @@ _thread_add_matched_message (notmuch_thread_t *thread, static void _resolve_thread_relationships (notmuch_thread_t *thread) { - notmuch_message_node_t *node; + notmuch_message_node_t *node, *first_node; notmuch_message_t *message, *parent; const char *in_reply_to; - for (node = thread->message_list->head; node; node = node->next) { + first_node = thread->message_list->head; + if (! first_node) + return; + + for (node = first_node->next; node; node = node->next) { message = node->message; in_reply_to = _notmuch_message_get_in_reply_to (message); if (in_reply_to && strlen (in_reply_to) && @@ -406,6 +410,31 @@ _resolve_thread_relationships (notmuch_thread_t *thread) _notmuch_message_list_add_message (thread->toplevel_list, message); } + /* + * if we reach the end of the list without finding a top-level + * message, that means the thread is a cycle (or set of cycles) + * and any message can be considered top-level. Choose the oldest + * message, which happens to be first in our list. + */ + if (first_node) { + message = first_node->message; + in_reply_to = _notmuch_message_get_in_reply_to (message); + if (thread->toplevel_list->head && + in_reply_to && strlen (in_reply_to) && + g_hash_table_lookup_extended (thread->message_hash, + in_reply_to, NULL, + (void **) &parent)) + _notmuch_message_add_reply (parent, message); + else + _notmuch_message_list_add_message (thread->toplevel_list, message); + } + + /* XXX this could be made conditional on messages being inserted + * (out of order) in later passes + */ + thread->toplevel_list = _notmuch_message_sort_subtrees (thread, thread->toplevel_list); + + /* XXX: After scanning through the entire list looking for parents * via "In-Reply-To", we should do a second pass that looks at the * list of messages IDs in the "References" header instead. (And