X-Git-Url: https://git.notmuchmail.org/git?p=notmuch;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notmuch-reply.c;h=39377e1842fb101b8935790bd1ef6f35806dd44f;hp=0d29cf075d0c8b61d39910ec6ddd24605a0a8649;hb=9ddde6eb14c126e314d90e2e08f213fb81f0457f;hpb=62379f3dee5bc3673007271bc43ecc2587ac4e22

diff --git a/notmuch-reply.c b/notmuch-reply.c
index 0d29cf07..39377e18 100644
--- a/notmuch-reply.c
+++ b/notmuch-reply.c
@@ -188,18 +188,11 @@ add_recipients_for_string (GMimeMessage *message,
     return add_recipients_for_address_list (message, config, type, list);
 }
 
-/* Some mailing lists munge the Reply-To header despite it being A Bad
- * Thing, see http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
- *
- * This function detects such munging so that reasonable headers can be
- * generated anyway.  Returns 1 if munged, else 0.
- *
- * The current logic is fairly naive, Reply-To is diagnosed as munged if
- * it contains exactly one address, and this address is also present in
- * the To or Cc fields.
+/* Does the address in the Reply-To header of 'message' already appear
+ * in either the 'To' or 'Cc' header of the message?
  */
 static int
-mailing_list_munged_reply_to (notmuch_message_t *message)
+reply_to_header_is_redundant (notmuch_message_t *message)
 {
     const char *header, *addr;
     InternetAddressList *list;
@@ -254,14 +247,18 @@ add_recipients_from_message (GMimeMessage *reply,
     const char *from_addr = NULL;
     unsigned int i;
 
-    /* When we have detected Reply-To munging, we ignore the Reply-To
-     * field (because it appears in the To or Cc headers) and use the
-     * From header so that person will get pinged and will actually
-     * receive the response if not subscribed to the list.  Note that
-     * under no circumstances does this fail to reply to the address in
-     * the Reply-To header.
+    /* Some mailing lists munge the Reply-To header despite it being A Bad
+     * Thing, see http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
+     *
+     * The munging is easy to detect, because it results in a
+     * redundant reply-to header, (with an address that already exists
+     * in either To or Cc). So in this case, we ignore the Reply-To
+     * field and use the From header. Thie ensures the original sender
+     * will get the reply even if not subscribed to the list. Note
+     * that the address in the Reply-To header will always appear in
+     * the reply.
      */
-    if (mailing_list_munged_reply_to (message)) {
+    if (reply_to_header_is_redundant (message)) {
 	reply_to_map[0].header = "from";
 	reply_to_map[0].fallback = NULL;
     }
@@ -285,6 +282,68 @@ add_recipients_from_message (GMimeMessage *reply,
     return from_addr;
 }
 
+static const char *
+guess_from_received_header (notmuch_config_t *config, notmuch_message_t *message)
+{
+    const char *received,*primary;
+    char **other;
+    char *by,*mta,*ptr,*token;
+    char *domain=NULL;
+    char *tld=NULL;
+    const char *delim=". \t";
+    size_t i,other_len;
+
+    received = notmuch_message_get_header (message, "received");
+    by = strstr (received, " by ");
+    if (by && *(by+4)) {
+	/* sadly, the format of Received: headers is a bit inconsistent,
+	 * depending on the MTA used. So we try to extract just the MTA
+	 * here by removing leading whitespace and assuming that the MTA
+	 * name ends at the next whitespace
+	 * we test for *(by+4) to be non-'\0' to make sure there's something
+	 * there at all - and then assume that the first whitespace delimited
+	 * token that follows is the last receiving server
+	 */
+	mta = strdup (by+4);
+	if (mta == NULL)
+	    return NULL;
+	token = strtok(mta," \t");
+	if (token == NULL)
+	    return NULL;
+	/* Now extract the last two components of the MTA host name
+	 * as domain and tld
+	 */
+	while ((ptr = strsep (&token, delim)) != NULL) {
+	    if (*ptr == '\0')
+		continue;
+	    domain = tld;
+	    tld = ptr;
+	}
+
+	if (domain) {
+	    /* recombine domain and tld and look for it among the configured
+	     * email addresses
+	     */
+	    *(tld-1) = '.';
+	    primary = notmuch_config_get_user_primary_email (config);
+	    if (strcasestr (primary, domain)) {
+		free (mta);
+		return primary;
+	    }
+	    other = notmuch_config_get_user_other_email (config, &other_len);
+	    for (i = 0; i < other_len; i++)
+		if (strcasestr (other[i], domain)) {
+		    free (mta);
+		    return other[i];
+		}
+	}
+
+	free (mta);
+    }
+
+    return NULL;
+}
+
 static int
 notmuch_reply_format_default(void *ctx, notmuch_config_t *config, notmuch_query_t *query)
 {
@@ -296,8 +355,8 @@ notmuch_reply_format_default(void *ctx, notmuch_config_t *config, notmuch_query_
     char *reply_headers;
 
     for (messages = notmuch_query_search_messages (query);
-	 notmuch_messages_has_more (messages);
-	 notmuch_messages_advance (messages))
+	 notmuch_messages_valid (messages);
+	 notmuch_messages_move_to_next (messages))
     {
 	message = notmuch_messages_get (messages);
 
@@ -316,6 +375,9 @@ notmuch_reply_format_default(void *ctx, notmuch_config_t *config, notmuch_query_
 
 	from_addr = add_recipients_from_message (reply, config, message);
 
+	if (from_addr == NULL)
+	    from_addr = guess_from_received_header (config, message);
+
 	if (from_addr == NULL)
 	    from_addr = notmuch_config_get_user_primary_email (config);
 
@@ -371,8 +433,8 @@ notmuch_reply_format_headers_only(void *ctx, notmuch_config_t *config, notmuch_q
     char *reply_headers;
 
     for (messages = notmuch_query_search_messages (query);
-	 notmuch_messages_has_more (messages);
-	 notmuch_messages_advance (messages))
+	 notmuch_messages_valid (messages);
+	 notmuch_messages_move_to_next (messages))
     {
 	message = notmuch_messages_get (messages);