X-Git-Url: https://git.notmuchmail.org/git?p=notmuch;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notmuch-reply.c;h=3c5b253e0c15ad99a3dd6e8a8636464536f9c78c;hp=0d29cf075d0c8b61d39910ec6ddd24605a0a8649;hb=4fd9ea05e896e77e388f3012e619f4e805282944;hpb=62379f3dee5bc3673007271bc43ecc2587ac4e22 diff --git a/notmuch-reply.c b/notmuch-reply.c index 0d29cf07..3c5b253e 100644 --- a/notmuch-reply.c +++ b/notmuch-reply.c @@ -188,18 +188,11 @@ add_recipients_for_string (GMimeMessage *message, return add_recipients_for_address_list (message, config, type, list); } -/* Some mailing lists munge the Reply-To header despite it being A Bad - * Thing, see http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html - * - * This function detects such munging so that reasonable headers can be - * generated anyway. Returns 1 if munged, else 0. - * - * The current logic is fairly naive, Reply-To is diagnosed as munged if - * it contains exactly one address, and this address is also present in - * the To or Cc fields. +/* Does the address in the Reply-To header of 'message' already appear + * in either the 'To' or 'Cc' header of the message? */ static int -mailing_list_munged_reply_to (notmuch_message_t *message) +reply_to_header_is_redundant (notmuch_message_t *message) { const char *header, *addr; InternetAddressList *list; @@ -254,14 +247,18 @@ add_recipients_from_message (GMimeMessage *reply, const char *from_addr = NULL; unsigned int i; - /* When we have detected Reply-To munging, we ignore the Reply-To - * field (because it appears in the To or Cc headers) and use the - * From header so that person will get pinged and will actually - * receive the response if not subscribed to the list. Note that - * under no circumstances does this fail to reply to the address in - * the Reply-To header. + /* Some mailing lists munge the Reply-To header despite it being A Bad + * Thing, see http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html + * + * The munging is easy to detect, because it results in a + * redundant reply-to header, (with an address that already exists + * in either To or Cc). So in this case, we ignore the Reply-To + * field and use the From header. Thie ensures the original sender + * will get the reply even if not subscribed to the list. Note + * that the address in the Reply-To header will always appear in + * the reply. */ - if (mailing_list_munged_reply_to (message)) { + if (reply_to_header_is_redundant (message)) { reply_to_map[0].header = "from"; reply_to_map[0].fallback = NULL; } @@ -285,6 +282,69 @@ add_recipients_from_message (GMimeMessage *reply, return from_addr; } + +static const char * +guess_from_received_header(notmuch_config_t *config, notmuch_message_t *message) +{ + const char *received,*primary; + char **other; + char *by,*mta,*ptr,*token; + char *domain=NULL; + char *tld=NULL; + const char *delim=". \t"; + size_t i,other_len; + + received = notmuch_message_get_header (message, "received"); + by = strstr(received," by "); + if (by && *(by+4)) { + /* we know that there are 4 characters after by - either the 4th one + * is '\0' (broken header) or it is the first letter of the hostname + * that last received this email - which we'll use to guess the right + * from email address + */ + mta = strdup(by+4); + if (mta == NULL) + return NULL; + /* After the MTA comes its IP address (or HELO response) in parenthesis. + * so let's terminate the string there + */ + if ((ptr = strchr(mta,'(')) == NULL) { + free (mta); + return NULL; + } + *ptr = '\0'; + /* Now extract the last two components of the MTA host name + * as domain and tld + */ + token = mta; + while ((ptr = strsep(&token,delim)) != NULL) { + if (*ptr == '\0') + continue; + domain = tld; + tld = ptr; + } + if (domain) { + /* recombine domain and tld and look for it among the configured + * email addresses + */ + *(tld-1) = '.'; + primary = notmuch_config_get_user_primary_email (config); + if (strcasestr (primary, domain)) { + free(mta); + return primary; + } + other = notmuch_config_get_user_other_email (config, &other_len); + for (i = 0; i < other_len; i++) + if (strcasestr (other[i], domain)) { + free(mta); + return other[i]; + } + } + free(mta); + } + return NULL; +} + static int notmuch_reply_format_default(void *ctx, notmuch_config_t *config, notmuch_query_t *query) { @@ -296,8 +356,8 @@ notmuch_reply_format_default(void *ctx, notmuch_config_t *config, notmuch_query_ char *reply_headers; for (messages = notmuch_query_search_messages (query); - notmuch_messages_has_more (messages); - notmuch_messages_advance (messages)) + notmuch_messages_valid (messages); + notmuch_messages_move_to_next (messages)) { message = notmuch_messages_get (messages); @@ -315,9 +375,13 @@ notmuch_reply_format_default(void *ctx, notmuch_config_t *config, notmuch_query_ g_mime_message_set_subject (reply, subject); from_addr = add_recipients_from_message (reply, config, message); - - if (from_addr == NULL) - from_addr = notmuch_config_get_user_primary_email (config); + + if (from_addr == NULL) { + from_addr = guess_from_received_header (config, message); + if (from_addr == NULL) { + from_addr = notmuch_config_get_user_primary_email (config); + } + } from_addr = talloc_asprintf (ctx, "%s <%s>", notmuch_config_get_user_name (config), @@ -371,8 +435,8 @@ notmuch_reply_format_headers_only(void *ctx, notmuch_config_t *config, notmuch_q char *reply_headers; for (messages = notmuch_query_search_messages (query); - notmuch_messages_has_more (messages); - notmuch_messages_advance (messages)) + notmuch_messages_valid (messages); + notmuch_messages_move_to_next (messages)) { message = notmuch_messages_get (messages);