X-Git-Url: https://git.notmuchmail.org/git?p=notmuch;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notmuch-reply.c;h=49513732e620d4867d1676878bd06d6124fb0062;hp=a74194a31e4fc7be9505659a973146fc70a295b2;hb=6a833a6e83865f6999707cc30768d07e1351c2cb;hpb=eac29763896e457a738f811b2c2ba8f877498e62

diff --git a/notmuch-reply.c b/notmuch-reply.c
index a74194a3..49513732 100644
--- a/notmuch-reply.c
+++ b/notmuch-reply.c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
  * GNU General Public License for more details.
  *
  * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
- * along with this program.  If not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/ .
+ * along with this program.  If not, see https://www.gnu.org/licenses/ .
  *
  * Authors: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
  *	    Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ add_recipients_from_message (GMimeMessage *reply,
     unsigned int n = 0;
 
     /* Some mailing lists munge the Reply-To header despite it being A Bad
-     * Thing, see http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
+     * Thing, see http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-harmful.html
      *
      * The munging is easy to detect, because it results in a
      * redundant reply-to header, (with an address that already exists