From c690420076b5b2597311085b7cde82f64deabe88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Carl Worth Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:04:48 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] TODO: Add "notmuch tag" and thoughts on avoiding races in archiving threads. The archive-thread race condition doesn't even exist now because there's no command for modifying tags at the level of a thread (just individual messages). --- TODO | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index baec040d..c5c748f6 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -1,5 +1,25 @@ +Write a "notmuch tag" command to add/remove tags from messages +matching a search query. + Write a "notmuch show" that displays a single thread. Fix to use the *last* Message-ID header if multiple such headers are encountered, (I noticed this is one thing that kept me from seeing the same message-ID values as sup). + +Think about this race condition: + + A client executes "notmuch search" + Then executes "notmuch show" on a thread + While user is reading, new mail is added to database for the thread + Client asks for the thread to be archived. + + The bug here is that email that was never read will be + archived. That's bad. With the command set above, the user can + avoid the problem by just not running "notmuch new" while reading + mail, but the same problems exists with the API. One possible + solution would be to store an additional timestamp with each mail + document for the time it was added to the database. Then searches + could return a timestamp, and the client could pass that same + timestamp back to the archive command to not modify any messages + with a timestamp newer than what's passed. -- 2.43.0