aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>2016-06-02 12:26:12 -0400
committerDavid Bremner <david@tethera.net>2016-06-05 08:26:54 -0300
commit385f62baa1df439cb6365101faf31c0f6f2f2935 (patch)
tree58d522a5bb0e332e3284c8ee97c6838895d61c7a
parent8540c36a96f5270d84d19dcbfbc9f6463f1653fd (diff)
update link to Chip Rosenthal article about reply-to munging
The original link is currently returning an internal server error :(
-rw-r--r--notmuch-reply.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/notmuch-reply.c b/notmuch-reply.c
index a74194a3..457e54ab 100644
--- a/notmuch-reply.c
+++ b/notmuch-reply.c
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ add_recipients_from_message (GMimeMessage *reply,
unsigned int n = 0;
/* Some mailing lists munge the Reply-To header despite it being A Bad
- * Thing, see http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
+ * Thing, see http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-harmful.html
*
* The munging is easy to detect, because it results in a
* redundant reply-to header, (with an address that already exists