| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-23 | test: replace aging OpenPGP key used in the test suite | Justus Winter | |
| This replaces the old OpenPGPv4 key that is used in the test suite with a more modern OpenPGPv4 key. All cryptographic artifacts in the test suite are updated accordingly. Having old cryptographic artifacts in the test suite presents a problem once the old algorithms are rejected by contemporary implementations. For reference, this is the old key. sec rsa1024 2011-02-05 [SC] 5AEAB11F5E33DCE875DDB75B6D92612D94E46381 uid [ unknown] Notmuch Test Suite <test_suite@notmuchmail.org> (INSECURE!) ssb rsa1024 2011-02-05 [E] And this is the new key. Note that is has the same shape, but uses Ed25519 and Cv25519 instead of 1024-bit RSA. sec ed25519 2022-09-07 [SC] 9A3AFE6C60065A148FD4B58A7E6ABE924645CC60 uid [ultimate] Notmuch Test Suite (INSECURE!) <test_suite@notmuchmail.org> ssb cv25519 2022-09-07 [E] | |||
| 2019-05-29 | test: protected headers should work when both encrypted and signed. | Daniel Kahn Gillmor | |
| Up to this point, we've tested protected headers on messages that have either been encrypted or signed, but not both. This adds a couple tests of signed+encrypted messages, one where the subject line is masked (outside subject line is "Subject Unavailable") and another where it is not (outside Subject: matches inner Subject:) See the discussion at https://dkg.fifthhorseman.net/blog/e-mail-cryptography.html#protected-headers for more details about the nuances between signed, stripped, and stubbed headers. Signed-off-by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> | |||
