1 From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
2 Subject: Re: rfc: rewrite commit subject line for subsystem
3 maintainer preference tool
4 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:22:58 +0000
6 Message-ID: <20101116232258.GC24623@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
7 References: <1289850773.16461.166.camel@Joe-Laptop>
8 <20101116104921.GL12986@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
9 <1289919077.28741.50.camel@Joe-Laptop>
10 <20101116183707.179964dd@schatten.dmk.lab>
11 <20101116181226.GB26239@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
12 <20101116203522.65240b18@schatten.dmk.lab>
13 <20101116195530.GA7523@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
14 <20101116122102.86e7e0b9.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
15 <1289940156.28741.207.camel@Joe-Laptop>
16 <20101116124609.382e42fb.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
18 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
19 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
20 Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>,
21 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>,
22 Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
23 To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
24 X-From: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Wed Nov 17 00:22:58 2010
25 Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
26 Envelope-to: glad-alsa-devel-2@m.gmane.org
27 Received: from alsa0.perex.cz ([212.20.107.51])
28 by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
29 (envelope-from <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>)
31 for glad-alsa-devel-2@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:22:57 +0100
32 Received: by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000)
33 id 28F9610381A; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:22:55 +0100 (CET)
34 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on mail1.perex.cz
36 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled
38 Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
39 by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC8D10381B;
40 Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:22:55 +0100 (CET)
41 X-Original-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
42 Delivered-To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
43 Received: by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000)
44 id B1B8B10381B; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:22:52 +0100 (CET)
45 Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
46 [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB03810381A
47 for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:22:51 +0100 (CET)
48 Received: from finisterre.wolfsonmicro.main
49 (cpc3-sgyl4-0-0-cust125.sgyl.cable.virginmedia.com [82.41.240.126])
50 by opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39A957881C9;
51 Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:22:51 +0000 (GMT)
52 Received: from broonie by finisterre.wolfsonmicro.main with local (Exim 4.72)
53 (envelope-from <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>)
54 id 1PIUra-0001BL-NS; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:22:58 +0000
55 Content-Disposition: inline
56 In-Reply-To: <20101116124609.382e42fb.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
57 X-Cookie: Beware of Bigfoot!
58 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
59 X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
60 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
62 List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers -
63 http://www.alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel.alsa-project.org>
64 List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
65 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
66 List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel>
67 List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
68 List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
69 List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
70 <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
71 Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
72 Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
73 Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1063492>
75 On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:46:09PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
76 > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:42:36 -0800 Joe Perches wrote:
78 > > Some subsystem maintainers like upper case, some mixed, some lower.
79 > > Some aren't consistent. (Staging/staging)
81 > Case usually doesn't matter to most of us.
83 Given that we're working in case sensitive languages here it's probably
84 safe to assume that a reasonable proportion of people will care; being
85 reasonably consistent with existing practice for the subsystem seems