+++ /dev/null
-Message-ID: <4EFC743A.3060609@april.org>
-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2010 15:07:54 +0100
-From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Boulogne?=" <boulogne.f@gmail.com>
-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
- rv:9.0) Gecko/20111224 Thunderbird/9.0.1
-MIME-Version: 1.0
-To: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>,
- "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" <aur-general@archlinux.org>
-References: <4EFC3931.6030007@april.org> <4EFC3D62.4030202@archlinux.org>
-In-Reply-To: <4EFC3D62.4030202@archlinux.org>
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
-Subject: Re: [aur-general] Guidelines: cp, mkdir vs install
-
-Le 29/12/2011 11:13, Allan McRae a écrit :
-> On 29/12/11 19:56, François Boulogne wrote:
->> Hi,
->>
->> Looking to improve the quality of my packages, I read again the guidelines.
->> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards
->>
->> However, it don't see anything about the install command like
->> install -d $pkgdir/usr/{bin,share/man/man1,share/locale}
->>
->> Some contributors on AUR use cp or mkdir to install files/dir (when no
->> makefile is provided) and others use install command.
->>
->> What's the opinion of TU on this point?
->>
->
-> Use install with -m specifying the correct permissions
->
-
-Thank you Allan
-
-
---
-François Boulogne.
-https://www.sciunto.org